Sonia Gandhi and Congress Secret Billions Exposed
Source for following article http://www.iretireearly.com/sonia-gandhi-and-congress-secret-billions-exposed.html
What was Rajiv Gandhi’s fatal error in politics? It does not need a seer to say that it was his claim to honesty
— branding himself as ‘Mr Clean’ — that proved fatal to him. Indira Gandhi was his contrast. Asked
about corruption in her government, she said nonchalantly, ‘it was a global phenomenon’. This was in 1983. An
honest Delhi High Court judge even lamented how could corruption be controlled when someone holding such a high position had
almost rationalised it. The result, no one could ever charge Indira Gandhi with corruption, because she never claimed to be
clean. But, ambitious to look ideal, Rajiv proclaimed honesty and so provoked scrutiny; in contrast, Indira, opting to be
practical, immunised herself against scrutiny. Eventually, Rajiv’s claim to honesty became the very cross on which he
was crucified in the 1989 elections when the Bofors gun shot the Congress out of power. The lesson to the political class
was: don’t claim to be honest, if you really are not so. The hard lesson seems forgotten now by the Gandhi family itself.
Sonia Gandhi, instead of following Indira’s safe path, is wrongly caught on Rajiv’s risky steps. The consequences
seem to be ominous. Will the politics of 1987 to 1989 repeat?
Following Rajiv and forgetting Indira, Sonia Gandhi proclaimed ‘zero tolerance’ to corruption at a party rally
in Allahabad in November 2010. She repeated it at the Congress plenary in Delhi weeks later. Asking the cadre to take the
corrupt head on, she said that her party was ‘prompt’ in acting against the corrupt; ‘never spared the corrupt’
because corruption impedes development’. This was almost how Rajiv Gandhi spoke in the Congress centenary in Mumbai
25 years ago. Two crucial differences marked Rajiv away from Sonia. First, when Rajiv claimed to be ‘Mr Clean’,
he had no scams to defend against. But, Sonia claims to be honest amidst huge and continuing scams — CWG, Adarsh, 2G Spectrum allocation scam…. Next, Rajiv had a clean slate to begin with, with no known skeletons in his cupboard till the Bofors scam smashed
his ‘Mr Clean’ image. In contrast, Sonia’s slate is full of credible exposures of bribes and pay-offs in
billions of dollars secreted in Swiss bank accounts, not counting Quattrocchi’s millions from Bofors. To make it worse,
for almost two decades now, she has not dared to deny the exposures or sue the famous Swiss magazine or the Russian investigative
journalist who had put out evidence of bribe against the Sonia family. Seen against this background, Sonia’s vow to
act against the corrupt seems like a suspect hooting ‘catch the thief’ and scooting away. This is the main story
that unfolds here.
$2.2 billions to 11 billions!
A stunning exposure on Sonia Gandhi’s secret billions in Swiss banks came, surprisingly, from Switzerland itself,
where the world’s corrupt stash away their booty. In its issue of November 19, 1991, Schweizer Illustrierte, the most
popular magazine of Switzerland, did an exposÚ of over a dozen politicians of the third world, including Rajiv Gandhi, who
had stashed away their bribe monies in Swiss banks. Schweizer Illustrierte, not a rag, sells some 2,15,000 copies and has
a readership of 9,17,000 — almost a sixth of Swiss adult population. Citing the newly opened KGB records, the magazine
reported ‘that Sonia Gandhi the widow of the former Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi was controlling secret account with
2.5 billion Swiss Francs (equal to $2.2 billion) in her minor son’s name’. The $2.2 billion account must have
existed from before June 1988 when Rahul Gandhi attained majority. The loot in today’s rupee value equals almost Rs
10,000 crore. Swiss banks invest and multiply the clients’ monies, not keep them buried. Had it been invested in safe
long-term securities, the $.2.2 billion bribe would have multiplied to $9.41 billion (Rs 42,345 crore) by 2009. If it had
been put in US stocks, it would have swelled to $12.97 billion (Rs 58,365 crore). If, as most likely, it were invested in
long-term bonds and stocks as 50:50, it would have grown to $11.19 billion (Rs 50,355 crore). Before the global financial
meltdown in 2008, the $2.2 billion bribes in stocks would have peaked at $18.66 billion (Rs 83,900 crore). By any calculation
the present size of the $2.2 billion secret funds of the family in Swiss banks seems huge — anywhere between Rs 43,000
plus to some Rs 84,000 crore!
The second exposÚ, emanating from the archives of the Russian spy outfit KGB, is far more serious. It says that the Gandhi family has accepted political pay-offs from the KGB — a clear
case of treason besides bribe. In her book The State Within a State: The KGB and its Hold on Russia-Past, Present, and Future,
Yevgenia Albats, an acclaimed investigative journalist, says: “A letter signed by Victor Chebrikov, who replaced Andropov
as the KGB head in 1982 noted: ‘the USSR KGB maintains contact with the son of the Premier Minister Rajiv Gandhi (of
India). R Gandhi expresses deep gratitude for the benefits accruing to the Prime Minister’s family from the commercial
dealings of the firm he controls in co-operation with the Soviet foreign trade organisations. R Gandhi reports confidentially
that a substantial portion of the funds obtained through this channel are used to support the party of R Gandhi’.”
(p.223). Albats has also disclosed that, in December 2005, KGB chief Victor Chebrikov had asked for authorisation from the
Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, “to make payments in US dollars to the family members
of Rajiv Gandhi, namely Sonia Gandhi, Rahul Gandhi and Ms Paola Maino, mother of Sonia Gandhi.” And even before Albats’
book came out the Russian media had leaked out the details of the pay-offs. Based on the leaks, on July 4, 1992, The Hindu
had reported: “the Russian Foreign Intelligence Service admits the possibility that the KGB could have been involved
in arranging profitable Soviet contract for the company controlled by Rajiv Gandhi family”.
Rajiv Gandhi’s sad demise delayed the Swiss and Russian exposÚ on Sonia being picked up here. But Indian media’s
interest in it actually coincided with Sonia Gandhi assuming leadership of the Congress. A G Noorani, a well-known columnist,
had reported on both Schweizer Illustrierte and Albats’ exposÚs in Statesman (December 31, 1988). Subramanian Swamy
had put out the photocopies of the pages of Schweizer Illustrierte and Albats’ book in his website along with the mail
of the Swiss magazine dated February 23, 2002 confirming that in its article of November 1991 it had named Rajiv Gandhi with
a total of Swiss Franc 2.5 billion ($2.2 billion) in secret account; it had also offered to supply a original copy of the
magazine to Swamy. (See: http://www.janataparty.org/annexures/ann10p43.html) These facts were again recalled in my article
in The New Indian Express (April 29, 2009) written in response to Sonia Gandhi speech at Mangalore (April 27, 2009) declaring
that, “the Congress was taking steps to address the issue of untaxed Indian money in Swiss banks”. The article
had questioned her about her family’s corrupt wealth in Swiss banks in the context of her vow to bring back the monies
stashed away abroad. Rajinder Puri, a reputed journalist, has also earlier written on the KGB disclosures in his column on
August 15, 2006. Recently, in India Today (December 27, 2010) the redoubtable Ram Jethmalani has referred to the Swiss exposÚ,
asking where is that money now? So the Indian media too has repeatedly published the details of the secret billions of the
Gandhi family investigated by the Swiss and Russian journalists. Amal Datta (CPI(M)) had raised the $2.2 billion issue in
Parliament on December 7, 1991, but Speaker Shivraj Patil expunged the Gandhi name from the proceedings!
But, what has been the response of Sonia or Rahul, major after June 1988, to the investigation by Schweizer Illustrierte
and Albats and to the Indian media’s repeated references to their investigation? It can be summed up in one word: Silence.
Thus, apart from the exposÚs, the deafening silence of the Gandhis itself constitutes the most damaging and self-incriminating
evidence of the family’s guilt. When Schweizer Illustrierte alleged that Sonia had held Rajiv Gandhi’s bribes
in Rahul’s name in Swiss banks, neither she nor the son, protested, or sued the magazine, then or later; nor did they
sue A G Noorani or Statesman when they repeated it in 1998, or later; nor would they sue Subramanian Swamy when he put it
on his website in 2002; neither did they sue me, or the Express when the article was carried in April 2009. When major papers,
The Hindu and The Times of India included, had carried the expose on KGB payments in the year 1992 itself adding that the
Russian government was embarrassed by the disclosures, neither of the Gandhis challenged or sued them; nor did they sue Yevgenia
Albats when she wrote about KGB payments to Rajiv Gandhi in 1994. Neither did they act against Swamy when he put Albats’
book pages on his website or when Rajinder Puri, a well-known journalist, wrote about it in his column on August 15, 2006.
However, a feeble but proxy suit was filed by Sonia loyalists to defend her reputation when Albats’ exposÚ was made
part of the full-page advertisement in The New York Times in 2007 issued by some NRIs to ‘unmask’ Sonia to the
US audience, as they claimed. The suit was promptly dismissed by a US court because Sonia herself did not dare file the suit.
Shockingly even that suit did not challenge the $2.2 billion Swiss account at all!
Imagine that the report in Schweizer Illustrierte
or in Albats book was false and Sonia Gandhi did not have those billions in secret accounts in Rahul Gandhi’s name or
the family was not paid for its service to the KGB as alleged. How would they, as honest and outraged people, have reacted?
Like how Morarji Desai, then retired and old at 87, responded in anger when, Seymour Hersh, a Pulitzer Prize-winning investigative
journalist, had mentioned in his book that Morarji Desai was a ‘paid’ CIA mole in the Indian Cabinet. Morarji
Desai forthwith filed a libel suit. Commenting in The American Spectator, Rael Jean Isaac wrote in 2004, five years after
Morarji Desai had passed away, that Hersh habitually indulged in character assassination; and in his attempt to do down Henry
Kissinger, Morarji Desai became the victim. Isaac added that Desai, 87, calling it a “sheer mad story”, reacted
in outrage with a libel suit seeking $50 million in damages. When the suit came up, as Desai, 93, was too ill to travel to
US, Kissinger testified on Desai’s behalf, flatly contradicted Hersh’s charge and stated that Desai had no connection
to the CIA. That is how even retired and old persons, honest and so offended and outraged, would act. But see the self-incriminating
contrast, the complete absence of such outrage, in Sonia, who is reigning as the chairperson of the UPA now, neither retired
or tired like the nonagenarian Morarji Desai, being just 41 when the story broke out in Schweizer Illustrierte. Imagine, not
Sonia or Rahul, but Advani or Modi had figured in the exposÚs of Schweizer Illustrierte or Albats. What would the media not
have done to nail them? What would the government of Sonia not have done to fix them?
Rs 20.80 lakh-crore loot
The billions of the Gandhi family being both bribes and monies stashed away in Swiss banks, they are inextricably linked
to the larger issue of bringing back the huge national wealth stashed abroad. All world nations, except India, are mad after
their black wealth secreted in Swiss and like banks. But India has shown little enthusiasm to track the illicit funds of Indians
in Swiss and other banks. Why such reticence?
When during the run-up to the 2009 Lok Sabha elections, the BJP leader L K Advani promised to bringing back, if voted to
power, Indian monies estimated between $500 billion and $1.4 trillion stashed abroad, the Congress first denied that there
was such Indian money outside. But when the issue began gathering momentum, Manmohan Singh and Sonia Gandhi had to do damage
control and promise that the Congress too would bring back the national wealth secreted abroad. Global Financial Integrity
(GFI), a non-profit institution working against global black funds, has recently estimated that the Indian wealth secreted
away is about $462 billion, approximately equal to Rs 20.80 lakh-crore. The GFI says that more than two-thirds of it was looted
away under the liberalisation regime. This is what the GFI says about the character of the loot: “From 1948 through
2008, India lost a total of $213 billion in illicit financial flows (or illegal capital flight)” through “tax
evasion, corruption, bribery and kickbacks, and criminal activities”. Does one need a seer to say under what head would
the $2.2 billion in Sonia family’s secret account (which would have grown to $9 to $13 billion by now) fall? But accretions,
if any, from the loot in 2G and CWG where the numbers are even bigger are not still accounted. Now comes the more critical,
yet practical issue. When the Sonia Gandhi family is among the suspects who have secreted away monies abroad, how will it
affect the efforts to bring back the wealth stashed away by others?
Just a couple of examples will demonstrate how the government is unwilling to go after Indian money secreted
abroad. As early as February 2008 the German authorities had collected information about illegal money kept by citizens of
different countries in Lichtenstein bank. The German finance minister offered to provide the names of the account holders
to any government interested in the names of its citizens. There were media reports that some 250 Indian names were found
in the Lichtenstein Bank list. Yet, despite the open offer from Germany to provide the details, the UPA-II government has
never showed interest in the Indian accounts in Lichtenstein Bank. The Times of India reported that “the ministry of
finance and PMO have, however, not shown much interest in finding out about those who have their lockers on the secret banks
of Liechtenstein which prides itself in its banking system”. But under mounting pressure the Indian government asked
for details not under the open offer but strategically under India’s tax treaty with Germany. What is the difference?
Under the tax treaty the information received would have to be kept confidential; but, if it were received openly, it can
be disclosed to the public. Is any further evidence needed to prove that the government is keen to see that the names of Indians
who had secreted monies abroad are not disclosed?
The second is the sensational case of Hasan Ali, the alleged horse-breeder of Pune, who was found to have operated Swiss
accounts involving over Rs 1.5 lakh-crore. The income tax department has levied a tax of Rs 71,848 crore on him for concealing
Indian income secreted in Swiss accounts. This case is being buried now. The request sent to the Swiss government was deliberately
made faulty to ensure that the Swiss would not provide details. Some big names in the ruling circles are reportedly linked
to Hasan Ali. That explains why the government would not deepen the probe. It is Hasan Alis and the like who transport through
hawala the bribes of the corrupt from India. If Hasan Ali is exposed, the corrupt will stand naked. This is how the hawala
trader and the corrupt in India are mixed-up.
Is it too much to conclude that thanks to Sonia family’s suspected billions in Swiss accounts the system cannot freely
probe the $462 billion looted from India at all? Tail-pieces: The total wealth of both Gandhis, as per their election returns,
is just Rs 363 lakh, Sonia owning no car. Sonia lamented on November 19, 2010, that graft and greed are on the rise in India!!
Rahul said on December 19, 2010, that severe punishment should be given to the corrupt!!! Amen.
|Allegations of black money and account with Swiss
Sonia Gandhi is hiding the very true facts, regarding, her permanent allegiance to the Constitution of Italy, if she is not
According to Citizenship law of Italy Ms. Priyanka and Shri Rahul
Gandhi are Italian by Birth, since at the time of their birth, admittedly, Smt. Sonia Gandhi, holds an Italian
Citizen. According to Italian Law, even after renouncement of Italian Citizen, the "ITALIAN CITIZENSHIP BY BIRTH"
is always put on hold for restoration, within one year from a declaration, without any administrative interference.
Therefore, permanent allegiance to Constitution of Italy of Smt. Sonia Gandhi, Ms. Priyanka
and Shri Rahul Gandhi are always prevails.
(1) Sub-clause (a) of the Clause 1 of Article
1 of the Citizenship Law of Italy,
the Citizen by birth is defined that: “the child of a father or
a mother, who are Italian Citizens.”
(2) Sub-clause (c) of the Clause 1 of Article 13 of the Citizenship Law of Italy provides that “He who lost the citizenship shall recover it: if he declares
he wants to recover it and he resided or he resides in the territory of Republic, within one year from the declaration;”.
If, I not Killed,
by Political Hooligans,
I will prove
“PURSUANT TO ITALIAN LAW, IF HOLDER OF ANOTHER CITIZENSHIP, LIKE INDIA, HE/SHE IS
ONLY ITALIAN CITIZEN, BECAUSE IN VIEW OF THE ITALIAN LAW, IT IS THE ITALAIN CITIZENSHIP, THAT PREVAILS OVER ANY OTHER”
Read More Details inside the Website.