Allegiance2ItalianConstitution
Reminder dated 7th January 2008, to CJI
Home | Do You Know Your Sonia? - by Dr. Subramanian Swamy | Supreme Court Judgment - 2001 | My Delhi High Court Writ Petition | Petition for Review of Order dated 9th May, 2006 | Attorney General of India or Attorney of Smt. Gandhi? | Complaint dated 7th May, 2007 against Justice Vijendra Jain and Justice Swatantra Kumar | Reminder dated 7th January 2008, to CJI | Application dated 14th October, 2008 to prosecute Justice Vijendra Jain and Justice Swatantra Kumar

Dated 7th January, 2008

To,

Hon’ble Chief Justice of India Mr. K. G. Balakrishanan,

Through Registrar General of Supreme Court of India,

New Delhi-110011

 

Hon’ble Lordship,

 

That on 7th May, 2007, I have submitted a ‘STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL COMPLAINT’, before your Lordship through Registered Post, against “FIXED ORDERS”, passed by the respective Hon’ble Judges of Delhi High Court, the then Bench headed by the then Acting Chief Justice of Delhi High Court Mr. Vijender Jain and another Bench headed by the then Judge of Delhi High Court Mr. Justice Swatanter Kumar, which were passed at the cost of the Integrity of the Propriety and Sovereignty of the Constitution of India and in serious violation of the Oath taken under Article 219 of the Constitution of India, and violation of their Constitutional function, to protect efficacy of the Judiciary, but just to save the political carrier of the foreign origin of Smt. Sonia Gandhi, who’s allegiance to a foreign State (ITALY) is acknowledged and prevails permanently, unequivocally and irrevocably under the Constitution of Italy and Citizenship Law of Italy, giving rise the impression that Smt. Sonia Gandhi is above the Constitution of India. Copy of the said Complaint is once again enclosed herewith which self-explanatory, and I repeat and reiterate what are referred therein, without referring them here once again. However, after submission of the said Complaint I came to know that the then Acting Chief Justice of Delhi High Court Mr. Vijender Jain was elevated as the Chief Justice of Punjab and Haryana High Court and Mr. Justice Swatanter Kumar, was elevated as Chief Justice of Mumbai High Court, with a four elevation of Judges from Delhi High Court within a short span of one year. All this creates a climate of raising serious doubts that the aforesaid elevations of the then Acting Chief Justice of Delhi High Court Mr. Vijender Jain as the Chief Justice of Punjab and Haryana High Court and Mr. Justice Swatanter Kumar, as Chief Justice of Mumbai High Court, looks like that same might have been made under compromising situation.

 

One may raise question that why I not filed Appeal against such Order. In this respect without going in detail, I must refer that I have suffered severe injustice from the Supreme Court Registry, certainly under embracement from Judicial Mafiadom, which is developed in recent period, thus blocked my right to move Supreme Court, guaranteed under Article 32 of the Constitution of India. In fact Supreme Court Registry, illegally and unconstitutionally refused to register my Writ Petition, which I filed under Article 32 of the Constitution. By refusing to register my Writ Petition, gave clear impression that I have no right to justice against influential and powerful people. My Writ Petition was refused to Register under Order XVIII Rule 5 of Supreme Court Rules, 1966, (substituted by G.S.R. 407 (w.e.f. 20-12-1997). According to agenda item referred in respective as appears from the certified copy of the file noting received under Right to Information Act, 2005, said Rule was amended to block the ‘Fax Messages’ received with prayers to register as Public Interest Litigation. I applied about 57 Applications under Right to Information Act, 2005, before CPIO of Supreme Court, and get several hundred pages of the Certified Copies of the documents, to justify aforesaid charges against Supreme Court Registry. Aforesaid Refusal to register my Writ Petition, just benefited to ‘Powerful Land Mafia of Kolkata’, who is having close Nexus with the powerful politician of Country, justifying the fact that the ‘Fundamental Right of Equality before the law’ is not exist in India, for the remedy seekers like me, since I have taken bold stand against unjust and wrong doings and approaches leading to corrupt practices, so much so, even I had to face several attacks on my person as well as other members of my family, when it came in confrontation with those who mattered most in State politics. This eventually led me to shift my base from Kolkata to Delhi for the safety of life of my family and my own-self. However, my fight against corrupt practices goes on unabatedly. We have all seen in the past and is being experienced more prominently in today’s climate that how the very Fundamental Rights and Liberties are not only flagrantly violated but even shamelessly recourse is taken without any compunctions to eliminate those (like me) who dare to stand to point a finger to the violations of the very edifice of freedom by resorting to such corrupt practices.  

 

Aforesaid situation created by Supreme Court Registry, by refusing to register my Writ Petition, I was strongly restrained, from moving Supreme Court, against the said Orders passed by then Acting Chief Justice of Delhi High Court Mr. Vijender Jain and another Bench headed by the then Judge of Delhi High Court Mr. Justice Swatanter Kumar, committing serious Contempt of the Supreme Court, by overruling the effect of Supreme Court Judgments. However, some people misused such Fixed Orders of Delhi High Court, against me, thus I decided to remove the tag of ‘STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL COMPLAINT’, and hereby my aforesaid Complaint would be open for the Public. However, copy of the same was also posted, at the same time i.e. on 7th May, 2007, to Smt. Sonia Gandhi, Attorney General of India Ld. Mr. Millon Banerjee, Additional Solicitor General of India Mr. Gopal Subramanium (who once ditched me in his capacity as my Counsel), and Hon’ble Mr. Justice Swatanter Kumar, all by Registered post. In this context, I must add more fact relating to threat caused by the Government pleader in the aforesaid matter of Delhi High Court. That immediately after Bench headed by the then Hon’ble Mr. Justice Swatanter Kumar of Delhi High Court completed the hearing in the said matter and left for Chamber, on 9th March, 2007 Ld. Mr. Rajeeve Mehra, Advocate, the Government Counsel in the matter, in presence of several Advocates threaten me in a manner as if he is threatening me with dire consequences. I sent a letter to him on 9th March 2007 by Registered Post, which was returned to me with postal remarks “Left”. I have kept the said letter packed in cover, in my custody.   

 

Therefore, hereby once again I humbly pray before your Honors to adopt punitive measures against Contempt of the Hon’ble Supreme Court’s Judgments, particularly when committed by High Court Judges, since committing of Contempt of Supreme Court Judgments by High Court Judges in violation of Article 141 of the Constitution, is more serious then committed by a Common man. This is warranted to protect Efficacy of the Supreme Court and remove the serious effect that Smt. Sonia Gandhi is above the Constitution of India. And I hereby further prayed that Your Honor should enquire whether aforesaid Elevations were result of any compromising situation? This is a very serious matter and to establish the efficacy of the Oath under the Constitution of India taken by Judges of Supreme Court as well as of the High Courts, it should be looked in to seriously. Otherwise Oath would become meaningless, and growth of the corruption, within the judiciary cannot be stopped.

            

With Best Regards and Respects,

Your Honor’s faithfully,

 

 

(Milap Choraria)

B-5/52, Sector-7, Rohini,

Delhi-110085

Enclosed: As above,

 

Copies to following 7 (Seven) other senior most Hon’ble Justices of the Supreme Court, who will not retire within next six months, through Registrar General of the Supreme Court:

  1. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bishwa Nath Agrawal,  
  2. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashok Bhan,
  3. Hon'ble Dr. Justice Arijit Pasayat,
  4. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satya Brata Sinha,
  5. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashok Kumar Mathur,
  6. Hon'ble Mr. Justice C.K. Thakker, and
  7. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Tarun Chatterjee.

Dated 7th January, 2008

To,

Registrar General of Supreme Court of India,

New Delhi-110011

 

Hon’ble Sir,

 

I am enclosing herewith my representation dated January 7, 2008, addressed to Hon’ble Chief Justice of India Mr. K. G. Balakrishanan, with copies to following 7 (Seven) other senior most Hon’ble Justices of the Supreme Court, who will not retire within next six months, through Registrar General of the Supreme Court:

1.   Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bishwa Nath Agrawal,  

  1. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashok Bhan,
  2. Hon'ble Dr. Justice Arijit Pasayat,
  3. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satya Brata Sinha,
  4. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashok Kumar Mathur,
  5. Hon'ble Mr. Justice C.K. Thakker, and
  6. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Tarun Chatterjee.

 

I hope that these representations would be presented before the respective Hon’ble Justice to ensure Justice to me. 

            

With Best Regards and Respects,

Your Honor’s faithfully,

 

 

(Milap Choraria)

B-5/52, Sector-7, Rohini,

Delhi-110085

 

Enclosed: As above,

Enter content here

Enter supporting content here

TRUTH SHALL PREVAIL